About Us
Mission Statement
Rules of Conduct
 
Name:
Pswd:
Remember Me
Register
 

Defending the Constitution?
Author: BobR    Date: 01/15/2025 13:44:46

There's so much going on now, what with Special Prosecutor Jack Smith's report being released, to Anal Orange back-peddling on campaign promises, to House Speaker Mike Johnson and TX Governor Abbott both stating they will raise the flags on Jan 20th (still lowered for former President Jimmy Carter's passing). This doesn't even include the fires in CA, which seem to be taking a back seat to the circus in DC.

The real fireworks yesterday, though, occurred during the Senate hearings for potential Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth. The questioning followed the expected partisan lines:

Pete Hegseth, a self-described former Fox News “disruptor” and President-elect Trump’s choice to be Defense secretary, blasted through a cloud of controversies Tuesday on his way to what is expected to be Senate confirmation. A vote is expected Monday.

The bottom line: No Republican members of the Armed Services Committee displayed an appetite to buck Trump on his first Cabinet pick. And while Democratic senators assailed Hegseth, 44, an Army National Guard veteran, as unfit to manage the Pentagon and a poor role model to lead the armed forces, especially women, they were minority voices.

[...]

"You can’t seem to grasp that there is no U.S. military as we know it without the incredible women that we serve, women who earn their place in their units," said Duckworth, a retired Army National Guard lieutenant colonel who was critically wounded flying a combat helicopter in Iraq.

"You’re not qualified, Mr. Hegseth," she added with finality.

Yes, there's more:
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who had been considered a make-or-break vote for Hegseth, announced on Simon Conway’s radio show after the hearing that she would vote for the nominee.

[...]

Democrats repeatedly attacked and grilled him on his past comments about women in combat, the 2017 sexual assault accusation, his drinking and his infidelity — all of which he attempted to parry away by claiming they were made by anonymous individuals who were hell-bent on taking him down.

[...]

Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) asked Hegseth if he would deploy the U.S. military to seize Greenland or the Panama Canal, referencing Trump’s expansionist rhetoric from last week.

“Would you carry on an order from President Trump to seize Greenland, a territory of our NATO ally, Denmark, by force? Or would you take over the Panama Canal?” Hirono asked.

“Senator, I will emphasize that President Trump received 77 million votes to be the lawful commander,” Hegseth said, declining to say whether he would invade the territories.

No Republican senator on that committee asked him a challenging question - they all fluffed him. Here's hoping there are a handful of Republican senators willing to do the right thing when it comes time for them to vote.
 

4 comments (Latest Comment: 01/15/2025 15:51:16 by Raine)
   Perma Link

Share This!

Furl it!
Spurl
NewsVine
Reddit
Technorati

Add a Comment

Please login to add a comment...


Comments:

Order comments Newest to Oldest  Refresh Comments

Comment by Raine on 01/15/2025 14:07:55
About women in the military, it's not the women who are lowering standards.

Men need to step up.
Nearly 10,000 women signed up for active duty in 2024, an 18% jump from the previous year, while male recruitment increased by just 8%, the data shows. The hike comes as the service continues to struggle with recruiting men, who have traditionally filled the bulk of its ranks but have become more of a challenge to enlist in recent years.
Why?

Meanwhile, the Army's biggest recruiting challenge isn't just convincing men to sign up -- it's finding eligible ones. Academic standards have become a major barrier for recruits, with a significant portion failing to meet the minimum requirements for enlistment.





Comment by Raine on 01/15/2025 14:55:03
I remember a time when this was an austere governing body.

One of the most dismal things about the Trump era is the degree to which having one of the highest jobs in the land is seen as a birthright and not something that requires vetting or meeting any kind of ethical standards.

[image or embed]

— Andrea Pitzer (@andreapitzer.bsky.social) January 15, 2025 at 8:14 AM


Comment by Raine on 01/15/2025 14:55:20
I remember a time when this was an austere governing body.

One of the most dismal things about the Trump era is the degree to which having one of the highest jobs in the land is seen as a birthright and not something that requires vetting or meeting any kind of ethical standards.

[image or embed]

— Andrea Pitzer (@andreapitzer.bsky.social) January 15, 2025 at 8:14 AM


Comment by Raine on 01/15/2025 15:51:16

www.youtube.com/shorts/Uxu9Y...

[image or embed]

— Dan Dicks (@sonofsamdx.bsky.social) January 15, 2025 at 12:03 AM