The National Security Council said in a statement that it was looking into how a journalist’s number was added to the chain in the Signal group chat. In addition to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, it included Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s director of national intelligence.
Goldberg said he received the Signal invitation from Mike Waltz, Trump’s national security adviser, who was also in the group chat.
Hegseth in his first comments on the matter attacked Goldberg as “deceitful” and a “discredited so-called journalist” while alluding to previous critical reporting of Trump from the publication. He did not shed light on why Signal was being used to discuss the sensitive operation or how Goldberg ended up on the message chain.
[...]
The administration’s handling of the highly sensitive information was swiftly condemned by Democratic lawmakers. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer called for a full investigation.
“This is one of the most stunning breaches of military intelligence I have read about in a very, very long time,” Schumer, a New York Democrat, said in a floor speech Monday afternoon.
The handling of national defense information is strictly governed by law under the century-old Espionage Act, including provisions that make it a crime to remove such information from its “proper place of custody” even through an act of gross negligence.
BREAKING: The Atlantic reveals war plans shared on Signal chat after the government has repeatedly said that it included no classified information.
— MSNBC (@msnbc.com) March 26, 2025 at 9:06 AM
[image or embed]
lol
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona.bsky.social) March 26, 2025 at 9:15 AM
Check out Kevin McCarthy's spin just now on Fox:
"My only question to Goldberg, why did you wait so long? Why not pick up the phone and call the secretary of defense and ask him about this? ... did he hold it just because he wanted to embarrass somebody a day before a hearing?"
[image or embed]
JUST IN: Judge James Boasberg has been assigned to the Signalgate lawsuit.
— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney.bsky.social) March 26, 2025 at 9:12 AM
[image or embed]
The obvious is verified "As we stated in the first PC..."
— Michael McDonald (@electproject.bsky.social) March 26, 2025 at 9:34 AM
[image or embed]
Quote by Will_in_Ca:
Hello, bloggers!!!!
The Signalgate affair demonstrates the incompetence and deceitfulness of this administration. If this happened under a Democratic administration, Trump would be calling for criminal prosecutions and impeachment.
I hope that this scandal wakes a few people up. This is a level of incompetence that would call for firings if done by a corporation. I have to wonder what else has been discussed on Signal and who - invited or not - knew what was being discussed in an open application. (I would be shocked if Russian intelligence was NOT monitoring any electronic conversations by a visiting government officials.)
I think that some of my middle school students would have a great awareness than these officials.
Oh, well, if a journalist could scheme his way into the signal chat without being noticed, I am sure there is no way a foreign operative could.
— DrDinD.bsky.social (@drdind.bsky.social) March 25, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Do these people hear themselves?
[image or embed]
This is REALLY the lame-ass defense they are going with? They were “attack plans” not “war plans”?
— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) March 26, 2025 at 10:01 AM
[image or embed]